Finding Sex Partner East
The Story Of The Mortals And The Immortals Part III
courtesy of Biblegateway.com, International Translation
(Okay, the next episode of The Story of the Mortals and the Immortals, that is what this book should have been called, instead of the Holy Bible, but who am I to judge this book, let us peek into some of the angles I've taken this book through. I want to give you the glimpse of what we have covered thus far. This is an account of the creations besides us thus far in Chapter One. It is funny that we think, well let me say this more sensitized, it is a wonder that we could possibly think that we were the only ones in the pecking order of life, at this point those who think we are the predators and the prey has to be kidding. I am hoping they are kidding and not for real. I mean look, we die daily, and our world citizenship is higher in the bone yard, graveyard then in paradise of the living, so it is obvious that we are not functioning on more than a couple of cents. I would think life is more desirable then death, but what I know, I haven't been dead or have I? But, legally, no I have not been dead, but still in the right sense, logical sense, those who are alive the goals are to stay alive right? I mean, we work very hard to stay alive, or at least breathe daily. However, your logical faculties tell you, you are not dead, if you are reading this, and yes, what am I talking about death in that meaning, but the logical and scientific breathing of living organisms of environment and not hallucinations, so with that said, your consciousness is still here.
Maybe I should stop there, let us begin with the journey of part III. I was going through chapter two. Some have asked me to do the whole bible, but this is hard, but fun, yet, hard work, it would take me at least several years to do this verse by verse, chapter by chapter, and if I compile all of my journal entries it would be a project for the after life, or when I am gone for the young. They can sift through my notes and make sense of that gibberish...:) For today, let explore the story of God through the eyes of man, then through my eyes, and so here we go again. Maybe I should say my safe journey first instead of last for a disclaimer, and so here it is safe journey my friends into your own paradise, and may it be safe for us all.
1 Thus the heavens and the earth were completed in all their vast array.
(Now this is the account of the fish, birds, beasts, "in God's likeness fish, birds, beasts, male and female, " and now we step into the next work week of God. One more thing, "vast array" now who wants to develop that one, that could take years of exploration just that general word alone. My teachers use to hate it when I spoke in "generalist" terms, over there, everywhere, generalist and so forth, they asked for me to stop--over generalizing up and down, more details, then I would give too many details. It would be either too broad or general or too define and too flowery, for those who said, B.S. but I never would say that about my stuff. I work hard to get my Bachelor in Science or B.S. depending what side of the coin you are on..., a funny, oh boy, here's another one, M.S. and finally Ph.D.S, no let me stop, I am just kidding, I need to let out some energy. This is my journal and journey right, and I am sharing it with you. I can't believe you are reading this stuff, but if you are- thank you for keeping me company. Believe me your presence is enough to motivate me to the next chapter of my field. It would be nice if you was a good presence of inspiration and motivation, but if you are the opposition, yes I guess I could be sharpened and refined, but I can't promise you I will like it...:) Now back to the journey.
2 By the seventh day God had finished the work he had been doing; so on the seventh day he rested
Yes, some scholars have said this time frame is endless because there's no definite in time in the universe, or infinity, but the process. But, as we know, there is definite times as there are no time frames, so the definite times could possible be 1 aeon's or 1 zillion years or 7 zillion years, or whatever, the fact remains it could have been too long for us to calculate on our fingers. :) What, I can't joke anymore, is that my friends trying to kick me off of my own journal. It was a funny, see my tears it was funny to me, anyway, back to the focus.)
Adam and Eve 4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created. When the LORD God made the earth and the heavens- 5 and no shrub of the field had yet appeared on the earth [b] and no plant of the field had yet sprung up, for the LORD God had not sent rain on the earth [c] and there was no man to work the ground, 6 but streams [d] came up from the earth and watered the whole surface of the ground- 7 the LORD God formed the man [e] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.
(This is the run down, summary of what he has already made, what has been existence, and the pecking order, hierarchy of that existence, but still I would like to entertain, this is still before our time but after the big bang theory?...maybe, but let's entertain that the apes are still not born, or us.) (But, wait, I was wrong, there in verse 7 it is mentioned of what the creator or that higher species forming "the man" from the dust of the ground and then breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being. This explanation is almost like the big bang theory huh? You have to give humanity credit for trying to explain our birth. And now, my turn, a woman will try to explain it, now here I go, so we had to be formulated. We could possibly be evolved from a formulation of what? Or could we have been formulated like how we formulate robotics and cartoon animation? What is formulated? How about formulated like we do clay figurines. Now that is way too simple, and if we are formulated like figurines then who are we in the image of? What is duplicated or how were we inspired. Sometimes I wonder when I watch the movies, how in the world did they create the "Star Wars, Star Trek and so forth" the characters were massive and so detail and ever language, expertise, that must have been some art work in the making, but the founder of those characters, how in the world did he create those beginnings. Likewise, if it is intelligent or logical to say how could higher species formulate us from dirt, how simple or yet so complex.
(I will be back, my friend Melissa stopped by to chat, I will be back...:) Okay, I am back...:)
8 Now the LORD God had planted a garden in the east, in Eden; and there he put the man he had formed. 9 And the LORD God made all kinds of trees grow out of the ground-trees that were pleasing to the eye and good for food. In the middle of the garden were the tree of life and the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Okay, once again, we see this as a very normal and suggestive normal procedure of higher existence intermingling with humanity. As though it is no secret or mystery just an every day ritual of work. This (higher species, if you will for the sake of science) being we have named "God" made, no, planted a garden in the east, we called this a garden, but it was a large property, piece of land, say could there have been two earths connected together? It sounds as though one of the earths could have been the garden, and the other earth was wilderness. It could be possible, to entertain, that like the Gemini sign, earth could have possible had a connecting sphere as part of its own sphere which would have made it two, but yet one earth. It is just a suggestive thought that with this being forced to say it is still on earth, and we don't see it because it is another level of earth, higher dimension, so let me add to the melting pot, how about we say it is two earths, like when I go to Illinois, a street divides one city and then a new city begins literally, with a whole different City Council and jurisdiction, so I am thinking maybe to explain the idea of two civilizations in co existence without one seeing the other, possibly be two earths, and the question is where's the other earth. I remember when I was a child, I would hear on the news or on the radio when NASA discovered a new star that was as old if not older as the stars we gaze upon daily. The question that always made me wonder was how in the world did we just finally discover a star that they have calculated older than the sun, or so forth, us, and that goes to turtles. When we discover a turtle, we find that reading his back, he is older than most trees, and so forth. I am wondering this garden of Eden with enchantment as it has appeared to be, should still be in existence according to this document&183; If it is true, or we have translated it with accuracy. Therefore, we would conclude that this enchanted garden would contain plant life that produce healing herbals that gave immortality by consumption and on the other hand it gave incorruptibility or corruptibility on the other hand. Is it possible that the knowledge of good and evil is like a problematic society with a problematic system of good and evil. You have good bacteria and bad bacteria, it appears a house divided cannot stand. It is like chasing problems without solutions, or not having the "arrival" of that application due to the tossing back and forth of a double minded or "doubtful" mind. Here's my favorite part, if there were 1, 000 trees, just a tossed number, how in the world did that one tree become more pleasing than 1, 000, as though our eyes were fixed with that one. I think like most pleasure it is created to play on our weaknesses and senses that we can rely on our natural desire and instinct to automatically turn to that pleasure without thinking of the costs, consequences and so forth, and it is too late and we indulge in that pleasure, and like a caught mouse in a trap, we are caught in a trap of no return to that tease.
Yes, "a tease" like a donkey, the donkey must be "teased" to pull a heavy load, without the "tease" it does not have any desire to pull weight heavier than its own where horses is more tolerable and willing to carry heavy weight to a point of breaking its own legs to subject itself to a command. Yet, the donkey can pull heavier weight, but won't without "a motivate incentive" See how funny life is, you ask yourself in self examination why are you stubborn, then you realize you are not a horse, but a donkey, and then denial kicks in, I can't be a donkey breed, I must be a stallion, when in fact, you are a donkey if you were honest. These characters had to be donkeys, symbolically because a horse would have eaten any tree that came first on its list. It would have never made it to the forbidden fruit out of fear, unless there was no fear. Okay, let's stop there, we cannot get too deep, we will focus on the passing thoughts that the fforbidden fruit of "not getting into life" was eaten, but the "pleasure of exploring life" was eaten. Knowledge is powerful, but sometimes we never get a chance to use that power in that lifetime. Don't you hate it when someone say, you squandered your life, or you never met your potential, and in the facts, you wonder yourself, what the heck happened? Too much knowledge, chasing knowledge is like chasing men that don't want to marry, it is a endless day of no fruit in return, oops did i say that? okay, what about virgin women who say no, and make you wait, whatever you like, use it in your own "degree of interest" you can apply this with any aspect of your personal life. The overall picture is that some reason, these characters decided not to take advantage of eating the "tree of life" i mean never once thought of eating from that tree. I have had moments in my own life I would say, "I never thought of that?" I bet they were saying the same thing, I never thought of eating the tree of life before eating the tree of knowledge, but of course they didn't really understand the tree of life versus the tree of knowledge which would have been separate of wisdom is understanding. It is useless to have wisdom if you do not know how to apply it. Well, I shouldn't say that, because you can give that wisdom to others, but then who will listen but a few. Well let's continue on the journey of breaking apart, and giving different angles of this verse.
10 A river watering the garden flowed from Eden; from there it was separated into four headwaters. 11 The name of the first is the Pishon; it winds through the entire land of Havilah, where there is gold. 12 (The gold of that land is good; aromatic resin [f] and onyx are also there.) 13 The name of the second river is the Gihon; it winds through the entire land of Cush. [g] 14 The name of the third river is the Tigris; it runs along the east side of Asshur. And the fourth river is the Euphrates.
(I have heard many scholars say they have proof and found this land of Cush. They have provided evidence of the onyx and aromatic resin and all the rivers of gold in these claims of "finding" Eden, here's my question, this is questionable because this "enchanted kingdom or garden I should say" is not destroyed or was never vacant. It was fully populated, and so, if the other beings were able to eat from the tree of life, why would they die or leave such beautiful resources, so it is evident that the second earth, the wilderness exile is the "potential" of its sister, but it was not cultivated by God like the first one. On one hand, God planted the garden, meaning in this "living being" understanding, expertise, mastery, planted, toiled, and did the work, it produced this type of "enchantment" on the other hand, the land this "God" did not touch, was not producing any products or resources, and so we have two sides of the coin, so to speak. (For the sake of examination, I am trying to take a narration role and use terms of "Species to replace ancient terminology God" to identify that we are not alone in this matrix of living species. Okay finally, let's continue on...:)
15 The LORD God took the man and put him in the Garden of Eden to work it and take care of it. 16 And the LORD God commanded the man, "You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; 17 but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die."
Okay, you see the role humanity is learning to play, as a keeper of the park, garden if you will. Humanity was not the founder nor the designer, but the maintenance faculty, groundskeeper if you will. We keep up with what has been designed. "To Work it and Take Care of It" So, this type of man from dirt, did not have the same role as the other "beings in the species image" humanity had a simple role, man was told to "Work it and Take Care of It" he was to be a steward, so you see humanity was the hired help not the children of the house, but the slave to this higher existence. Yes, it was a very simple and humble role of just "working it and taking care of it" not "ruling it or governing it" but just plain ole, labor. The opportunity to eat anything in the garden but one tree, now that was just wrong, don't you agree, how are you going to put a cookie in front of a person and then say you can't have it. Some scholars said that in these world of "God, this higher species of intelligence, expertise and profession, " he held this tree off not because it was wrong or right, but because it was his, and his alone, and he did not choose to share this delicacy of his own tree. It is like telling someone you can have any food in this refrigerator but this one apple, but because that one apple looked so tasty, you eat the apple. It had nothing to do with the apple being bad, rotten, or deathly, but that you touched something that did not belong to you. Maybe the context was that "you will surely die, had nothing to do with you but the (process of you) meaning, you will piss me off, or i will be upset, and i can't promise anything but when i calm down, then we can talk, or who knows, it can be building blocks to a fire of suppressing or exploding, it is up to that type of anger. No we can not assume that death from separation of "God" meant we would decay from within logically, but to decay from having resources cut off, to manage on our own. The idea of Forestry Recreation Resource Management, my degree program has everything to do with "lack" of resources, and the "slow process and sometimes quick process of decay" that lack of resources can traumatize an environment and so a body to the point of rotten, death, permanent decay, aging process and finally self-termination or self-extinction process. Well this was obvious later in the story how they lived after eating the forbidden fruit. It is obvious that they had no idea what "was the story behind the scenes of the no, don't do that..."
We can perish because of ignorance. Some people say ignorance is bliss, and so it is because you have no idea of the consequences or as science would say the cause and effect of the situation fully understanding the application its degree of pain/suffering of decay, which brings me to why people say people who commit hate crimes are ignorant because the science of war or death of people, even if it is strangers, causes a rippling effect of self-destructive behavior. If you are able to kill one thing, what will get you to stop at nothing, famous story of this self-defeat process of why ignorance is not bliss because of the risk factors, the costs is the famous "Hitler" story, very good story. He killed seeing no cause of effect, but then in the end, completely and voluntarily kill himself, what was the purpose to having a pure race according to his belief system just to kill yourself, where was the value in his "motives and goals when in the end he could not profit or taste its fruits of its return." In the end, many employers have practiced these same tactics of self-annihilation that leads to destroying its own company the very company that they are willing to die for, they end of destroying it themselves. So, that is the ignorance in it, you can't repay evil with evil, but with good, to get a different results, and so it is reversed as well, and we have seen this in history also. How about the can't pay good with good, but with evil to get a result. If you do evil against a good person, you would break that person and in our society it is called oppression and slavery. The spirit of a good person becomes a dormant to evil because they are not able to respond to evil, and so you see these laws work against each other as equal as for each other, is that amazing or what. It is like a mirror and the reflection is amazing. well, without getting as a babbling fool, the idea of the "God" of setting apart the tree could have been many factors, on levels unknown to us, but if it was known to us, it could have been the basis of "this species knowing his weakness, and protecting us from its weakness, two weakness we see in this document of this higher species, one, don't piss me off by stealing from me, and two, don't make me jealous, if we can say this is the only two issues of this higher species, we can do well in its kingdom otherwise, "we are prone to discover lack of resources, which is like a lack of air." Yes, we can examine that our sins, errors could play a role of our own defeat, but with good resources any errors can be corrected, so I examine that's not the root of the matter, but the bottom line message is without air, you die, and i own it. This is how an employer would say, without a job, you won't have resources to eat, and I am resourceful willing to share, this can be a bully spectrum, but can we bold to say this "God" is a bully? Of course not, it is the idea of how can we "be well" in a system of us not having control in it unless we are doing well in it, the influence comes after we learn to do well in that system, which I would like to end on this note, understanding a species higher than our own, will always keep us guessing, because how can we understand a bigger quality and quantity if we can't even do our own math, well in that, we must have a teacher to learn these higher ways.
(Now it is lunch time...I'll be back) I am back
18 The LORD God said, "It is not good for the man to be alone. I will make a helper suitable for him."
Okay, this is an account to show that man did not get to choose themselves as a help mate which would show the idea of homosexuality. This is an account that maybe he did not think of it, but what he did receive was a mate appointed to him. It was sufficient at the time. It does not show any evidence that homosexuality was a detestable practice or abomination, but what it does show that God (this species) stands behind his commitments. The helpmate that was given for man was a female, in the image of male and female, and that was the operation or order of that "desire" we find in the plant kingdom and animal kingdom and so forth, that was full of diverse formulas and equations of male/male, female/female operations, and even transformation of male and female Sex, so it is common in the universe to be both species as one species, and so forth, so this idea of heterosexual marriage was the commitment to one person. This species' gave man a choice between beasts, fowl, and so forth, and it could not find a help mate, so with that said, the idea was that man was not given a choice but what he received. I suppose you can say that man was appointed in marriage rather fallen in love with marriage. Now we can develop this idea, very controversial idea that after the obligation of marriage, men were not allowed to marry men or women were not to marry women or even out side of their race, religion, and so forth for the sake of what? It was evident that the "God-species" was not informed by man that he wanted a relationship within his own Sex. It was not a negotiation that was approved because it was never asked, so if you don't ask you don't receive, I've always believed. How about he just didn't know that he could have chosen someone like himself. Other words, it was not something he could have discovered without some help to know that it was a possibility to have relations with the same Sex. It was familiar with the concept of male/female.
Some scholars would say that in all the verses of the bible, it was against the law to marry the same Sex and outside of the same race, and so forth, but it is evident in the beginning, it was a simple ignorance to man, not knowingly to ask for a same Sex partner. It was "Get what you get and don't throw a fit" concept. As you can see, he was not pleased with the mate he was given, and so the beginning of displeasure started. There are so many angles you can suggest in these verses, and please do not go saying, Keisha is this and that, you do not know me, I have examine, added to the melting pot of options and angles of perspectives, speculation and examining the scriptures, it is the root of the matter that we are examining that what was the snow ball effect. This man was not pleased with his mate after she failed him, and she was not pleased with her mate either, it was two sided. They were pleased with each other when all was well. Like our society now, men are not pleased with women when they make mistakes, neither are women pleased with men when they make errors, but I must examine the relationships with homosexuality, what is the satisfaction of disapproval, is it the same or much different.
I do not find that homosexuality do not come in play until Moses came down from the mountain with a new law. Noah lived in a society of "whatever goes, " so this entail that whatever goes was not healthy for the species of humanity, and the ignorance of "why" not, most time, it has nothing to do with the actual Sex, race, religion, but the lack of commitment, there I go again "lack" of resource in commitment, determination and endurance. As an illustration the "roots" of the matter was the issue not the "action" most verses address the intentions, or heart of man. This is the "path" that lead men astray not the actual desire, thought, or resource, but the actual process of that "commitment" I think it is safe to say that with different "intentions, and motives" a diverse world can become healthy, and living in a world with homosexuality, interracial relations, multi-culture behavior and multiple religions, can be the end of the world to some, but to others the beginning to a new world. It is how you want to see it, half full or half empty. I personally as an examiner, you can not say it is wrong for man to marry man or weak marry the strong, it was wrong for a moment for a ruler to marry his slave, so forth, the list can go on. (It was the "intentions, motives" that caused the decay, or defect of that situation not the desire) I can honestly say, examining the scriptures the desire was not the sin, but the "process" was the error, the sin.)
Today, we find people excusing others of discrimination and we find our economy down in the dumps why, not because we do not have capable people, it was never a problem in the past to find workers, all can work, but the "selection" to work has made the problem. This is another issue of not the desire but the process. I think this species wanted humanity to learn that for themselves. The laws given to Moses was for the sake of "the process" in man, not the desire in man. Meaning, I perceive that it was a concept of methodology, and practicing following a process or going through the right means of that process. Humanity was not able to approach this "Species as fellowship" with their issues. Like Cain, who had killed his brother, but was forgiven, and allowed to live, found favor not because he killed his brother but because he was able to request appropriately, he learned how to do "well" in that system. His brother did not come back to life, but Cain lived. Like Interracial relationships, miracles of people living with a disease and not dying from it, homosexuality, these are all cases that are allowed because of what, "the process" the idea of finding the approval of that in the "higher species, concept of ask and it shall be given unto you."
Too spooky, and contradictory you say, but the lion feed off the lamb, and you say not the same. Men Dogs have sex with men dogs, but you say not the same, trees can change sex within a lifetime, but yet you say not the same. In Matthew, it was examine if God, "the higher species can clothe the flowers, he will clothe everyone, and so on." It is not different, the laws of gravity is for everyone. The laws of approval is for everyone. It says study to show yourself approved by God for a reason, not to fall short to favor. It falls on everyone. Homosexuality, Interracial marriages, People who overcome diseases, Rich marrying the poor, and the poor marrying the rich, the list can go on in this diversity, but this one particular account was that a man was married to a woman not by choice but by obligation, and he was content. Another words saying, who can reject bone of my bone, flesh of my flesh, who can reject me? This was his way of saying, it is all good, not bad.
I suppose I will be hated, and stones thrown at me, but the land of the free is the land of the wild, watch, and observe, study the world around you and you'll see that you aren't the only ones that are fed.
19 Now the LORD God had formed out of the ground all the beasts of the field and all the birds of the air. He brought them to the man to see what he would name them; and whatever the man called each living creature, that was its name. 20 So the man gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field. But for Adam [h] no suitable helper was found. 21 So the LORD God caused the man to fall into a deep sleep; and while he was sleeping, he took one of the man's ribs [i] and closed up the place with flesh. 22 Then the LORD God made a woman from the rib [j] he had taken out of the man, and he brought her to the man.
23 The man said, "This is now bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called 'woman, [k] ' for she was taken out of man."
24 For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and they will become one flesh.
25 The man and his wife were both naked, and they felt no shame.
Therefore, for this chapter we see nothing was spoken about interracial relationships, homosexuality, multi-cultural marriages, interfaith marriages, and the list goes on, there was no law after this in regards to marriage. This was a one case basis. It was no written in stone that men could not be with man. Just see for yourself, in this passage it was simple as you get what you get and don't throw a fit, simple as that. Well, hopefully no one is mad, offended, and hate me, i love you all, and i love all of my friends. It is a beautiful opportunity to be "approved" by God, ask Cain. Well, safe journey my friends into your own paradises, may it be safe for us all. Remember I am a work in progress, and this is today's thoughts passing by, but the more I learn the stronger I stand...:)By Keisha Merchant - "Just Think" By Roy Lessin You're here not by chance, but by God's choosing. His hand formed you and made you the person you are. He compares you to no one else-- you are one of a kind. You lack nothing...
Next page: Discreet Sex Partners North
Bookmark/Share This Page: